您当前所在位置:首页 > 考研 > 考研真题 > 公共课真题 > 英语真题

2010年考研英语二真题

编辑:

2013-12-27

Text4

Many Americans regard the jury system as a concrete expression of crucial democratic values,

including the principles that all citizens who meet minimal qualifications of age and literacy are

equally competent to serve on juries; that jurors should be selected randomly from a representative

cross section of the community; that no citizen should be denied the right to serve on a jury on

account of race, religion, sex, or national origin; that defendants are entitled to trial by their peers;

and that verdicts should represent the conscience of the community and not just the letter of the law. The jury is also said to be the best surviving example of direct rather than representative

democracy. In a direct democracy, citizens take turns governing themselves, rather than electing

representatives to govern for them.

But as recently as in 1986, jury selection procedures conflicted with these democratic ideals.

In some states, for example, jury duty was limited to persons of supposedly superior intelligence,

education, and moral character. Although the Supreme Court of the United States had prohibited

intentional racial discrimination in jury selection as early as the 1880 case of Strauder v. West

Virginia, the practice of selecting so-called elite or blue-ribbon juries provided a convenient way

around this and other antidiscrimination laws.

The system also failed to regularly include women on juries until the mid-20th century.

Although women first served on state juries in Utah in 1898, it was not until the 1940s that a

majority of states made women eligible for jury duty. Even then several states automatically

exempted women from jury duty unless they personally asked to have their names included on the

jury list. This practice was justified by the claim that women were needed at home, and it kept

juries unrepresentative of women through the 1960s.

In 1968, the Congress of the United States passed the Jury Selection and Service Act,

ushering in a new era of democratic reforms for the jury. This law abolished special educational

requirements for federal jurors and required them to be selected at random from a cross section of

the entire community. In the landmark 1975 decision Taylor vs. Louisiana, the Supreme Court

extended the requirement that juries be representative of all parts of the community to the state

level. The Taylor decision also declared sex discrimination in jury selection to be unconstitutional

and ordered states to use the same procedures for selecting male and female jurors.

36. From the principles of the US jury system, we learn that ______

[A]both liberate and illiterate people can serve on juries

[B]defendants are immune from trial by their peers

[C]no age limit should be imposed for jury service

[D]judgment should consider the opinion of the public

37. The practice of selecting so-called elite jurors prior to 1968 showed_____

[A]the inadequacy of antidiscrimination laws

[B]the prevalent discrimination against certain races [C]the conflicting ideals in jury selection procedures

[D]the arrogance common among the Supreme Court justices

38. Even in the 1960s, women were seldom on the jury list in some states because_____

[A]they were automatically banned by state laws

[B]they fell far short of the required qualifications

[C]they were supposed to perform domestic duties

[D]they tended to evade public engagement

39. After the Jury Selection and Service Act was passed.___

[A] sex discrimination in jury selection was unconstitutional and had to be abolished

[B] educational requirements became less rigid in the selection of federal jurors

[C] jurors at the state level ought to be representative of the entire community

[D] states ought to conform to the federal court in reforming the jury system

40. In discussing the US jury system, the text centers on_______

[A]its nature and problems

[B]its characteristics and tradition

[C]its problems and their solutions

[D]its tradition and development

总结:以上是小编为大家整理的“2010年考研英语二真题”,希望可以帮助到大家。想了解更多考研内容,请继续关注精品学习网。

相关推荐:

考研英语真题:(2013-2009)考研英语一历年真题

2013年中医考研真题(部分题目)

标签:英语真题

免责声明

精品学习网(51edu.com)在建设过程中引用了互联网上的一些信息资源并对有明确来源的信息注明了出处,版权归原作者及原网站所有,如果您对本站信息资源版权的归属问题存有异议,请您致信qinquan#51edu.com(将#换成@),我们会立即做出答复并及时解决。如果您认为本站有侵犯您权益的行为,请通知我们,我们一定根据实际情况及时处理。